Don’t folks usually like ‘underdogs’?

DON’T FOLKS USUALLY LIKE ‘UNDERDOGS’?…. Over the summer, as Supreme Court confirmation hearings got underway for Elena Kagan, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) launched a lengthy broadside against former Justice Thurgood Marshall, Kagan’s hero.

“[W]hen [Kagan] was working in the Clinton administration,” Kyl complained, “she encouraged a colleague working on a speech about Justice Marshall to emphasize his unshakable determination to protect the underdog.”

This was intended as criticism. The idea of Marshall protecting the underdog was a concept Kyl found so troubling, it became part of his initial criticism of Kagan’s record.

Three months later, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) was asked why Jewish voters tend to vote Democratic.

Mr. Cantor believes the American-Jewish community is overwhelmingly Democratic because Jews “are prone to want to help the underdog.”

In a general sense, Cantor’s assessment of Jewish voters’ motivations may very well be true.

But I’m curious — why are Republicans not prone to want to help the underdog? Between Cantor and Kyl, should the public begin to think that a vote for Democrats is a vote for underdogs?

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation