The reemergence of ‘Waterloo’

THE REEMERGENCE OF ‘WATERLOO’…. I’d hoped DeMint would want to avoid this word.

A top conservative senator on Thursday indicated he is willing to go to extreme lengths to prevent a vote on raising the debt ceiling, even if it hurts the Republican Party politically.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said on the conservative Laura Ingraham Show that he is considering filibustering an upcoming vote on raising the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt limit, should it not contain other fiscal reforms.

When asked if that would serve as the GOP’s “Waterloo” in the 2012 elections, the senator replied, “If it is, then let it be.”

Deeper and deeper into the fever swamp they go.

On a related note, Dave Weigel reminds us that as recently as December, “only the most wild, untamed Republicans were saying they’d oppose a debt ceiling increase. Republicans were saying, on the record, that they would bring a ‘clean’ limit-raising bill to the floor.” All of this, obviously, has changed dramatically since.

Dave’s larger point is that the relevant players will make a lot of noise but eventually do the right thing, strike a deal, and raise the debt ceiling. I certainly hope that’s true.

But for guys like DeMint, who added this morning that’s he not concerned about default, it certainly doesn’t seem like Kabuki theater.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation