A point that may seem obvious but might not be to many people is this: the GOP did not have to threaten to bring down the economy to get the spending cuts it apparently achieved last night. The president, with backing from most Democrats in Congress, would almost certainly have yielded on those cuts, and probably more, in the normal course of bargaining over the next budget if the Republicans had also been willing to yield on tax increases. It’s important to understand this, because Republicans are going to want to portray their extortion strategy as necessary to achieving the goal of cutting spending and reducing the deficit, but it was not. It was a choice they made in order to get leverage over their opponents. The two parties were bargaining over fiscal matters, as they do every so often, but this time, one side pulled out a gun. That’s essentially what happened. It was an act of crime, not of necessity.
Paul Glastris is Editor in Chief of the Washington Monthly, founder of the magazine’s alternative college rankings, and president of the Washington Monthly Institute. He was previously a speechwriter for President Bill Clinton and a correspondent and editor at U.S. News and World Report. He is a co-founder of the National Vote at Home Institute and co-author of two books, “The Other College Guide: A Roadmap to the Right School for You,” and “Elephant in the Room: Washington in the Bush Years.” He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Slate, and other publications.
More by Paul Glastris

