Use of Force Resolution Slides Out of Committee On Slippery Slope

So after a morning of utter confusion, a use-of-force resolution was reported positively from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on a 10-7 vote with one “present” (Ed Markey). Three Republicans–ranking minority member Corker, plus Flake and–yes–McCain joined seven Democrats in supporting the resolution, while two Democrats–Udall and Murphy–joined five Republicans (including Rubio and Paul) in voting “no.”

The key moment prior to the final vote was a voice vote passing an amendment by McCain and Chris Coons making a goal of the resolution “changing the moment on the battlefield,” which is intended to signal U.S. support for regime change without spelling it out or making it an ironclad commitment. This was presumably McCain’s price for supporting the resolution after noisily opposing it as recently as this morning. Now both neocons and opponents of intervention will tout this amendment as greatly expanding the U.S. commitment in Syria, with unpredictable consequences in both Houses of Congress. Accepting McCain’s amendment will definitely make it harder for the White House to win over House liberals who think the original use-of-force resolution might have gone too far.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.