Unraveling the Anti-Choice Bait and Switch

U.S. District Court Judge Lee Yeakel has blocked a central provision of a Texas abortion statute due to go into effect tomorrow, creating another path to a very likely Supreme Court review of the constitutional standards for the right to choose (or the lack thereof, some fear). As the Texas Tribune‘s Becca Aaronson reports, Yeakel pushed aside the late-term abortion rhetoric and noted that new abortion provider restrictions will affect early-term and supposedly noncontroversial procedures:

In his opinion, Yeakel wrote that a provision of House Bill 2 that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion facility “places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.”

In deploring the judge’s action, of course, Texas Gov. Rick Perry entirely ignored its explicit rationale:

“Today’s decision will not stop our ongoing efforts to protect life and ensure the women of our state aren’t exposed to any more of the abortion-mill horror stories that have made headlines recently,” Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement.

So the judge unraveled the anti-choice bait-and-switch and Perry promptly baited and switched once again. Typical.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.