The “Enthusiasm Gap” For 2014

Maybe I’ve missed an earlier survey, but today’s from Pew/USAT is the first I’ve seen this cycle measuring partisan “enthusiasm” about voting in 2014 (there’s also a test of “optimism,” which I find even less enlightening). Seems the “enthusiasm gap” favoring Republicans that got a lot of attention going into 2010 persists, though it’s smaller (53% of Republicans plus leaners are “very enthusiastic” about voting, as opposed to 47% of Democrats plus leaners).

Now to revisit some earlier observations about the “enthusiasm gap,” the proclivity of marginal (i.e., non-certain) voters to turn out is indeed a big deal, particularly in relatively low-turnout midterms, but it’s not very clear that “enthusiasm” as a subjective emotion has much to do with it. So long as Republicans maintain their recent advantages among whiter and older voters, they’ll have a turnout–and probably an “enthusiasm”–advantage, no matter what else is going on.

But subjective “enthusiasm” does not give a voter an additional vote, and isn’t necessarily valuable once it passes the point when a marginal voter becomes a certain voter. Indeed, “enthusiasm,” like “optimism,” can even become a handicap if it blinds a campaign–as appears to have happened with Mitt Romney’s in 2012–to its actual condition.

I do think Democratic “enthusiasm” will matter in 2014 simply because pro-Democratic demographic groups are significantly less likely to vote in midterms. But Republicans? I’m really not sure it’s that big a deal unless it reaches snake-dance-to-the-polls levels, and there’s some evidence that this sort of “base” excitement can actually alienate persuadable “swing” voters.

So you can keep your eye on such numbers going forward, but I wouldn’t get too enthusiastic about them. This is a quality that is as overrated in politics as it sometimes is in religion. Generally speaking, handling snakes is dangerous.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.