Poor Befuddled Americans and Their Privacy Concerns

Greg Sargent asks via Twitter what this statement issued by John Boehner in response to the president’s speech on NSA actually means:

Our national security programs exist to root out terrorist threats and save American lives – and they have. Because the president has failed to adequately explain the necessity of these programs, the privacy concerns of some Americans are understandable. When considering any reforms, however, keeping Americans safe must remain our top priority. When lives are at stake, the president must not allow politics to cloud his judgment. I look forward to learning more about how the new procedure for accessing data will not put Americans at greater risk. And the House will review any legislative reforms proposed by the administration, but we will not erode the operational integrity of critical programs that have helped keep America safe.

Looks like Boehner’s saying Obama’s reforms probably go too far, and are politically motivated, but hey, he can understand why Americans have been confused by Obama’s wretched lily-livered defense of the War on Terror and thus are wrongly worried about their privacy.

The bottom line might be expressed as a desire for the president to be damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t. Just saying that–or permanently emblazoning it at the top of the Speaker’s website, under the headline “Damned Obama!”–would save everybody a lot of time and trouble.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.