What Was That Middle Part Again?

There must have been some interesting water-cooler talk at the RNC when it became time for its much-ballyhooed 2013 Growth and Opportunity Project (better known as the “rebranding” project) to issue its one-year progress report (yeah, they claim it’s an “independent panel,” but we all know whose staff wrote the thing). What would they say about the most-reported recommendations having to do with adjusting the party’s message in a way that would attract hostile but increasingly critical young and minority voters? I mean, after all, Republican House members and conservative activists pretty much gave a two-word response, particularly when it came to immigration reform legislation: “Hell” and “No!”

The “one year check-up,” as it happens, conflates the demographic adjustment with a mechanical effort to deploy field staff, as though the substance of the party message is irrelevant. But for the most part, it dwells on the other stuff: data collection and technology, and changes in the GOP presidential primary process.

It kinda reminds me of that scene in the movie Moonstruck when the character played by Cher is in the confessional, and says: “I took the Lord’s name in vain three times, sleptwithmyfiancee’sbrother, and bounced a check at the liquor store.” The priest replies: “That’s not a sin if it wasn’t deliberate…. What was that middle part again?”

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.