HRC and Paid Family Leave

Two of my favorite writers, Democracy‘s Mike Tomasky and TNR’s Jonathan Cohn, have now both urged Hillary Clinton to make advocacy of paid family leave a touchstone of her putative 2016 presidential campaign. You can add my name to that particular petition.

Yes, the Chamber of Commerce and other business lobbies would savagely fight anything that looked like an entitlement to paid family leave supplied by employers. But it would represent a real challenge to cultural conservatives who have promoted a dystopic vision of the public sector as the enemy of the nuclear family. And there’s hardly any social problem in this country that isn’t exacerbated by the struggle of young parents–and particularly mothers–to make ends meet while raising kids. Raising the issue of paid family leave is a direct and unmistakable way to remind Americans they don’t really believe in laissez-faire capitalism, whatever their fears of Big Government or their disappointment with the current economy. And as both Tomasky and Cohn argue, it’s an issue that should appeal to HRC’s lifelong sense of mission in addressing the problems of vulnerable children.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.