Not too infrequently, I get into arguments with fellow pro-choicers about the sincerity of those who profess moral or religious objections to abortion. It’s really all about sex or all about denying women autonomy, I am told; all the God-talk and the fetus posters are a shuck.

I understand antichoice politics is in many cases a reflection of broader atavistic views, and I continue to struggle with the reasoning of conservative evangelicals who claim a biblical sanction for their hard-core antichoice position that I just don’t see at all (Catholics at least have a basis in tradition, papal teachings, and even Aristotelian biological notions for being antichoice). And I am acutely aware that many of those on the other side of the barricades on abortion policy think of themselves as engaged in a culture war with many, many dimensions.

Still, I do believe there are many antichoicers who feel compelled to oppose reproductive rights on the basis of a sincere belief that abortions represent homicides, and thus that legalized abortion represents something more important than all the other issues put together. I think they’re absolutely wrong, but I don’t think they’re making it up or simply disguising a generalized misogyny (particularly the many women who are antichoice activists).

That’s why I don’t understand the political survival of someone like Rep. Steve DesJarlais (R-TN), who’s at least even money for winning a third term over a strong primary challenge today.

DesJarlais is a big antichoice, “pro-family” pol first elected (like so many other mistakes) in 2010. During his 2012 re-election campaign, evidence began leaking out through various outlets that he had a history of alleged spousal abuse, serial adultery, sexual relationships with patients and at least three occasions of encouraging a woman to have an abortion (twice his soon-to-be-former wife, once a patient). Much of these toxic allegations seem to have been confirmed when DesJarlais’ divorce papers from his first wife were opened just after his 2012 re-election.

In dealing with this evidence, DesJarlais has allowed as how he made some mistakes in a “difficult period of his life,” blah blah blah, and has denied pushing a lover to have an abortion (though not pushing his then-wife to have two of them). So without even the drama of a public confession and act of contrition, he’s back to trying to pass laws telling other people how to live their sex lives.

I do not understand how anyone who actually thinks of abortion as a homicidal act can vote for someone–a medical professional no less–who admits to having encouraged it with no apparent great remorse. That it seems to have occurred as part of a pattern of systemic disregard for personal and professional ethical standards doesn’t help.

DesJarlais did attract a strong primary opponent, but at least one poll shows the incumbent with a healthy lead. We’ll see what happens tonight. But much as I wonder why the Republican voters of Louisiana so easily forgave David Vitter for illegal and adulterous sexual behavior, I can’t fathom the “he’s on our team” mentality of serious antichoicers who would vote for Scott DesJarlais. I mean, really, can’t you find someone to send to Congress who doesn’t make you all look like hypocrites?

Our ideas can save democracy... But we need your help! Donate Now!

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.