SCOTUS Helps Out Thom Tillis

Probably the best news for Thom Tillis’ Senate campaign in months was an unarticulated ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday that puts aside a Circuit Court decision preventing implementation of two provisions of North Carolina’s state-of-the-art voter suppression law. They were: a ban on same-day voter registration, and a flat prohibition on the counting of votes erroneously cast in the wrong precinct. (Other controversial provisions of the law, including a voter ID requirement and a reduction in early voting opportunities, were not put on hold by the Circuit Court).

While the majority did not explain its actions, a rueful dissent by Justice Ginsburg (joined by Justice Sotomayor) noted that the NC law would have almost surely been stopped had the Court not in the Shelby County v. Holder decision destroyed Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which made Article 5 preclearance of state laws in the South feasible–and that NC moved post-haste to pass such a law the minute SCOTUS cleared the way.

So I suppose there’s a sort of symmetry in the SCOTUS majority blessing its indirect handiwork. Say “Thanks!” Thom Tillis.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.