We’ve heard it so many times now that it will presumably become a regular feature of the 2016 presidential campaign, repeated ad nauseum to the cheers of “base” voters and debate audiences: Barack Obama (and it appears, Hillary Clinton) are “afraid” to refer to the people we are fighting in Iraq and Syria (and sometimes elsewhere) as “Islamic terrorists” or anything else with “Islam” underlined.

As Bloomberg Politics‘ Melinda Hennenberger explains to anybody who doesn’t get it, “fear” has nothing to do with the circumspect language used by Obama administration figures (including former figures like HRC). It’s part of the strategy for defeating these people:

[T]he rhetoric about ISIS is itself an important part of the tactical response to it. And the consensus among scholars of ISIS is that while Obama and Hillary Clinton are wrong to suggest that there’s nothing truly Islamic about the group, they’re right to be careful to deprive terrorists of any statements that could be construed as pitting the U.S. against Islam-statements that would be used as a recruiting tool.

Some of the Republican pols who bitch about this language endlessly as though they really think Obama just cannot bring himself to criticize America’s Enemies–maybe because he’s actually a Muslim?–are seeking Obama’s job, and I do wonder if any of them becomes president he (no, I’m not going to pretend Carly Fiorina is a serious candidate for president) will suddenly sound more or less like his predecessor, or his predecessor’s predecessor, George W. Bush, who was pretty careful on this subject as well. You know, candidates say all sorts of funny things in the foreign policy arena, like promising to recognize the Armenian genocide or move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

The other possibility, of course, is that a Republican president would double down on the candidate talk (Islamic State! Islamic State! Islamic State!) for the precise reason of rebranding the U.S. as Islamophobic, which would sure simplify Middle Eastern policy, wouldn’t it? Maybe that won’t happen. But you certainly have to wish these birds weren’t so quickly multiplying the number of words they will have to eat if they come to their senses.

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.