Chamber Gets Its Decision in EPA Case

You may have heard some talk the last few days, and not just among angry conservatives, that the Roberts Court is turning out to be surprisingly liberal. An important qualification of that observation would be that it doesn’t seem so “liberal” in any case involving corporate interests. The Chamber of Commerce did not file amicus briefs in either of last week’s big landmark cases involving same-sex marriage or Obamacare.

But the Chamber was engaged in another case where a 5-4 decision came down today that nobody would describe as “liberal”–Michigan v. EPA. Here the Court (with Scalia writing the opinion and Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas in support) overruled EPA’s practice under the Clear Air Act of considering industry costs in determining the means of securing pollution improvements but not in determining whether regulation is appropriate. This is a big victory for polluters that will indirectly reinforce the more general conservative/corporate proposition that environmental protection is a nice bauble we cannot afford.

We’ll have more later about the potential impact of this decision, and about the overall impact of this SCOTUS term. But for now, it would be good to curb any progressive enthusiasm about the Roberts Court, happy as we all are about last week’s big decisions.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.