Psychiatrists like myself aren’t supposed to speak up about politicians’ mental health. That needs to change.
Nassir Ghaemi
Nassir Ghaemi is a psychiatrist at Tufts and Harvard universities and author of A First-Rate Madness.
Sign up for our daily newsletter to get two stories in your inbox every weekday, plus a best-of-the-week roundup on Sundays. Opt out any time.
Nassir Ghaemi is a psychiatrist at Tufts and Harvard universities and author of A First-Rate Madness.
Psychiatrists like myself aren’t supposed to speak up about politicians’ mental health. That needs to change.
The data say white-collar jobs are booming. The Class of 2026 says the opposite. Both are right.
Keep reading
Some Republicans claim they want to eradicate sexual misconduct from Washington. What will they say about the president’s retaliation against E. Jean Carroll?
Keep reading
The Education Department investigates the venerable women’s school for admitting transgender women and granting them access to “women-only” spaces like dorms. A Smith College scholar shows how Trump’s perverse probe fits a conservative Republican pattern.
Keep reading
Democrats should unite behind Graham Platner if Maine’s Democratic voters pick him to run against Senator Susan Collins. But voters should make that choice first.
Keep reading
You’ve probably heard of Bowling Alone, the hugely influential 2000 book diagnosing our country’s malaise by Robert Putnam, the Harvard University political scientist. In it, Putnam showed that Americans’ stock of social capital—the fabric of a community’s trust and cooperation—had been plummeting since the 1950s, and that its decline was harming our well-being, personal relationships, health, lifespan, and economic growth. In the quarter-century since the book received widespread attention, social trust, accepted norms, and community cohesion continue to come undone, paving the way for the rise of authoritarian populism and damage to the republic. Indeed, the number of people saying…
Keep reading
New polling shows not so much ideological division among Democrats but a lack of consensus about where the party should go.
Keep readingSomething went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.