Social Security Dreck

SOCIAL SECURITY DRECK….I don’t really have the heart to wade back into the Social Security debate at the moment ? click here for the short version of how I feel about the whole thing ? but this paragraph from Sebastian Mallaby today really can’t go without rebuttal:

During the 2005 debate, President Bush endorsed an idea that would inflict no cuts whatsoever on low-income workers and would allow the value of middle-class retirees’ benefits to rise, albeit less quickly than now scheduled. Because this formula (devised by a Democrat named Robert Pozen) spreads the burden fairly, Democrats who worry about rising inequality should be open to it.

Just in case anyone is interested, I don’t think there’s a Democrat on the planet who worries about income inequality among the ranks of Social Security retirees. And Mallaby’s “less quickly than now scheduled” is just a cute way of saying that under the Pozen plan middle class retirees of the future would receive a smaller percentage of their average earnings than they do now. I don’t think I’d have to take off my shoes to count the number of progressives who think that’s a good idea.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation