Supporting the troops

SUPPORTING THE TROOPS…. The timing of the new GOP attacks could be better.

Republicans are already signaling they will paint any Dem opposition to General Stanley McChrystal’s demand for an expanded counterinsurgency as letting down the troops. House GOP leader John Boehner said today that Obama’s failure to fill the General’s demand right now amounted to “foot-dragging” that “puts our troops there at much greater danger than they would be otherwise.”

Three thoughts come to mind. First, this notion that deliberate decision-making undermines the military is absurd. President Obama explained yesterday that the U.S. shouldn’t “put resources ahead of strategy,” says “we’re going to take the time to get this right.” Boehner may prefer to escalate first and think later, but we tried it that way for eight years. It didn’t work.

Second, George W. Bush took months to ponder the “surge” policy in Iraq. I don’t recall leading Republicans whining at the time about presidential “foot-dragging” that “puts our troops there at much greater danger than they would be otherwise.”

And third, if John Boehner wants to talk about putting U.S. servicemen and women in danger, shouldn’t he explain why he voted against troop funding just a couple of weeks ago?

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation