The House Vote Authorizing Attack on IS

It happened fast enough that there was relatively little public discussion beyond that which followed the president’s speech last week, but yesterday the House authorized the administration to provide training and assistance to Syrian rebels in what will nonetheless almost certainly be remembered as a vote to approve whatever happens next.

The voting split was interesting, with Republicans supporting the measure (technically an amendment to a short-term funding extension for federal government operations) 159-71 and Democrats supporting it 114-85. I haven’t seen a precise breakdown yet, but it appears that Republican opponents were split between those opposing the intervention altogether and those opposing the limited nature of the authorization (including those wanting “boots on the ground”), while Democrats voting “no” were generally opposed to what some have called a Third Iraq War. The Senate is expected to approve the measure today, before Congress leaves Washington for its pre-election recess.

I’m sure we’ll have more about this vote and its implications later today and tomorrow.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.