Paul Not Dodging Abortion Question; Just Pandering

So Dave Weigel wants us to understand that in telling a New Hampshire interviewer asking about his somewhat weaselly positioning on abortion ban exceptions to go ask the DNC chair if she favored killing a seven-pound baby in the uterus, Rand Paul wasn’t avoiding the question but just performing the anti-choice movement’s preferred jui-jitsu on the subject.

Paul’s script-flip was exactly what the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List PAC had been advising Republicans to do since 2012. On Wednesday afternoon, the PAC put out a statement from President Marjorie Dannenfelser, telling reporters that “Rand was right,” and that “the current abortion debate is centered on a highly reasonable proposal to protect children after 20 weeks, or five months of pregnancy – the point at which they can feel excruciating pain.”

Well, Dave’s right to an extent, but in fact, this is the “script-flip” anti-choicers have been performing way back to the late 1990s, when banning “partial-birth abortion” became its favorite crusade. What Dannenfelser calls “the current abortion debate” is simply her side’s spin on the abortion debate, wherein we should be arguing over a relative handful of late-term abortions.

Now as it happens, I agree the question Paul got was the wrong one, insofar as it reinforces the lamentable tendency of the MSM to think of people who only want to ban 99.5% of abortions as sorta kinda pro-choice.

How’s this for a suggestion: why not let’s ask all politicians the same question: under what circumstances, exactly, would you favor government bans on abortion, instead of leaving that decision up to women and physicians? The focus on late-term abortions and exceptions to bans both obscure that basic question.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.