MORE LOTT….Brian Linse is finally back from some sort of non-blogging nonsense in England and has a post up about John Lott. He thinks we shouldn’t let the Mary Rosh/1997 survey business distract us from the bigger question of whether Lott’s main point is valid.
Well, sure, but the Mary Rosh stuff is a lot more fun. And I have to say that the question of whether Lott is willing to flat out lie (as opposed to spin statistics) is a pretty important one. If he lied about the survey, it throws all his research into serious doubt since there’s no telling whether he’s made up any other stuff.
Michelle Malkin, who might normally be thought sympathetic to Lott, seems to agree.
